29-01-2019, 10:47 AM
Just finished my CASA consultation survey. Having completed it and by reading all the information within the survey, it looks like it might be a good thing for aeromodelling as a whole. It certainly won't affect the majority of us flying at formal club fields. Registering as a field could be problematic for groups using, for example, a slope near a beach. Henry Joppic Park, the Yangan cricket oval and perhaps the stanthorpe field could be an issue... Barclay field won't be a problem. It's ours and isn't a public space. The wording says 'exclude 3rd parties' or something like that.
CASA isn't going to make a fortune out of it, unlike what I wrote last night. The vast majority of MAAA members won't need to register.
$20 a year and re-accreditation every 3 years is a small price for me (and maybe Dennis) to pay for the privilege of flying at home.
I think that it's the only way CASA would be able to educate 99% of drone and FPV users so that they have some sort of control over illegal and dangerous use of radio controlled aircraft. It may put an end to aeromodellers getting a bad name or copping flack because of a few drones in the state doing the wrong thing in the wrong place.
CASA isn't going to make a fortune out of it, unlike what I wrote last night. The vast majority of MAAA members won't need to register.
$20 a year and re-accreditation every 3 years is a small price for me (and maybe Dennis) to pay for the privilege of flying at home.
I think that it's the only way CASA would be able to educate 99% of drone and FPV users so that they have some sort of control over illegal and dangerous use of radio controlled aircraft. It may put an end to aeromodellers getting a bad name or copping flack because of a few drones in the state doing the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Everyone knows that REAL ENGINES are used by REAL men. Eklectic motors are best left for use in toothbrushes and other unnecessary things.